HOME/RESOURCES/THERAPY FOR BEGINNERS/ONLINE VS. IN-PERSON THERAPY: WHICH IS BETTER?
THERAPY FOR BEGINNERSCosts & Logistics

Online vs. In-Person Therapy: Which Is Better?

Online therapy looks broadly comparable to in-person therapy, and for OCD the trials back that up. Across 22 randomized trials, remote CBT for OCD showed no significant difference from face-to-face treatment, though people with more severe symptoms may do better in person. For ERP, online can even have an edge, because your triggers live at home, not in a therapist’s office.

By Justin La Rose, RP, M.Psy2026-03-067 min read1,700 words

Evidence last reviewed: October 2026

WRITTEN BY

Justin La Rose, RP, M.Psy is a Registered Psychotherapist and Clinical Director of The OCD Clinic in Toronto. He has worked in mental health for more than 25 years and treats OCD with Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP).

Clinical examples in this article are fictional composites created for educational purposes and do not describe any one client.

TL;DR
  • 01For OCD, remote CBT showed no significant difference from face-to-face treatment across 22 trials. For mental health care in general, video looks broadly comparable to in person.
  • 02For ERP specifically, online can have an edge, because your triggers are in your environment, not in a therapist's office.
  • 03COVID taught me something useful: my office was one of the least relevant places to treat OCD.
  • 04The bigger variable is the therapist. Do they actually do ERP?
  • 05Practical factors matter: commute, cost, scheduling. Don't let format ideology get in the way of actually going.

The pandemic moved my practice online, and it changed how I think about where ERP belongs. The edge online gives OCD treatment has nothing to do with convenience. It's about doing the work where the OCD actually lives. There's also a real limit, and you should know it before you choose. If you want the Ontario-specific version of this question, see online vs in-person ERP in Ontario.

The short answer

  • OCD trials: Across 22 randomized trials with 1,796 people, remote CBT for OCD showed no significant difference from face-to-face treatment (Salazar de Pablo et al., 2023).
  • The severity caveat: People with more severe OCD symptoms may do better in person, according to the same meta-analysis (Salazar de Pablo et al., 2023).
  • Beyond OCD: Video-delivered mental health services look broadly comparable to in-person care, a general finding that isn't specific to OCD (Batastini et al., 2021).
  • Where ERP happens: In my practice, online ERP lets us run exposures at the stove, the front door or the inbox where the OCD actually shows up, which an office can't offer.
  • How we offer it: The OCD Clinic sees people in person in Toronto at Yonge and Bloor and online anywhere in Ontario, with the same ERP approach either way.

What Does the Research Say About Online Therapy?

For OCD, the research finds no significant difference between online and in-person CBT. A 2023 meta-analysis published in the Journal of Affective Disorders (Salazar de Pablo and colleagues) examined 22 randomized controlled trials comprising 1,796 participants with OCD and found no statistically significant difference in OCD symptom outcomes between remotely-delivered CBT and face-to-face CBT. One nuance worth knowing: people with more severe baseline symptoms did somewhat better face to face (Salazar de Pablo et al., 2023). For mental health care more broadly, a separate review found video-delivered services broadly comparable to in-person care (Batastini et al., 2021).

Before 2020, there was legitimate clinical skepticism about online delivery. Would the therapeutic relationship suffer? Would non-verbal cues be too compromised? Would clients engage as seriously with sessions in their own space? These were reasonable questions. Then COVID forced the issue, and practitioners worldwide spent two years watching what happened when an entire profession moved online almost overnight.

Here’s what I saw in my own practice: the work didn’t fall apart. Some people attended more consistently once the commute was gone, and some found it easier to be open in their own space. For OCD, the trial data backs that up at the group level. The exception worth taking seriously is more severe OCD, where in person may be the better start.

Why Does Online Work for OCD?

Online works for OCD because your triggers live in your life, not in a therapist's office. When I moved my practice online during the pandemic, something became clear that I hadn't fully appreciated before: my office was one of the least relevant environments for OCD treatment.

OCD is triggered by specific stimuli. The kitchen stove. The front door lock. An unread work email that might contain bad news. An intrusive thought that arrives during the commute and demands immediate mental engagement. None of these triggers live in a therapist's office. The office is, in a very literal sense, an OCD-irrelevant space.

ERP (Exposure and Response Prevention) works by having you face the situations and stimuli that trigger your OCD while resisting the urge to do compulsions. The exposure needs to be real, and it works best where the OCD actually shows up. When you’re in your kitchen during a session, I’m virtually present in the environment where your OCD operates. I can see you. I can guide you through not checking the stove for the fifth time. I can be there as you carry the uncertainty of having left the house without triple-checking the lock. You predicted something bad, you didn’t check, and you find out what actually happens. That’s the learning.

These are what we call ecologically valid exposures: they happen in the real context where the disorder operates. From where I sit, not checking the stove is a one-metre jump. Standing in your own kitchen, it feels like a canyon. Doing it there, with me on the screen, is the point. In my experience, that can make online ERP more useful, not less.

InfographicOnline vs. In-Person: What the Evidence Shows
A: Equivalence
FOR OCD, AND MORE BROADLY
OCD: 22 trials, 1,796 participants, no significant difference between remote and face-to-face CBT; more severe symptoms may do better in person (Salazar de Pablo, 2023). Mental health care generally: video broadly comparable to in person (Batastini, 2021).
✓OCD: remote CBT
✓Mental health care in general
B: Online Edge
WHERE ONLINE HAS AN ADVANTAGE
OCD Treatment (ERP)
Triggers exist in your environment, not in a therapist's office
Geographic access
Especially for rural Ontario
C: In-Person Edge
WHERE IN-PERSON HAS AN ADVANTAGE
-Significant attachment trauma
-Children & adolescents
-Somatic / body-based work
The format is secondary. The therapist's expertise is primary.

When Is In-Person Therapy the Better Choice?

In-person therapy can be the better choice in two situations: more severe OCD, where the 2023 meta-analysis suggests people may do better face to face, and a few kinds of work that don't translate well to a screen. The equivalence research is real, and so are its limits. There are presentations where in-person therapy has a meaningful structural advantage, not because online is inferior, but because the specific needs of that work don’t translate as well to a screen.

Significant attachment trauma
When the therapeutic relationship itself needs to be built with particular care, because the client's history makes trust genuinely difficult, the physical presence of another person in the room can matter in ways that are hard to replicate over video. The concrete reality of being with someone is part of what makes the work corrective.
Children and adolescents
In my view, in person often works better with younger clients. Kids are less able to abstract the therapeutic relationship across a screen. Play-based and activity-based interventions, which often drive child therapy, are more naturally done in person.
Somatic and body-based work
Therapies that centre on body awareness, movement or physical co-regulation, such as EMDR with significant somatic components, sensorimotor psychotherapy and trauma-focused body work, have elements that require physical presence. Non-verbal communication is more complete when you're in the same room.

What Matters More Than the Format?

The therapist matters more than the format. Most of the time, the online-vs-in-person debate is a proxy for a different question: "Is the therapist I'm considering finding online as good as the one I might find if I went in person?"

This is the right question. Format is not the main lever. Therapist expertise, the quality of the relationship, and whether the treatment fits the problem matter far more in my view. An excellent therapist working online is a better bet than a mediocre therapist working in person. And it isn't about whether they've lived what you're living, either. I cover that in does my therapist need to share my experience.

The format question, in other words, is secondary to the therapist question. And the therapist question has a clear answer for OCD: you need someone who does ERP, who has specific training in OCD treatment, and who understands the disorder. In my view, that person working online is a better bet than a general therapist sitting across from you in an office. See the guide on choosing the right therapist if you're still in the selection phase. If you've already decided on format, The OCD Clinic runs both: online OCD therapy anywhere in Ontario and in-person sessions with an OCD therapist in Toronto, same ERP protocol either way. For how those fit alongside OHIP-funded and hospital options, see the region-by-region guide to OCD treatment across Ontario.

Ready to start OCD treatment?
Free 20-minute consultation. No commitment required.
Book Free Consultation →

What Are the Practical Upsides of Online Therapy?

The practical upsides are skipping the commute, wider access, sometimes a lower fee, and easier scheduling. They shouldn't be dismissed as mere convenience.

01
Commute eliminated
For clients with agoraphobia, social anxiety, or OCD around leaving the house, the commute to a therapist's office can itself be a barrier that prevents help-seeking. Online removes that obstacle entirely. For people whose anxiety makes public transit distressing, not having to navigate that before every session is clinically meaningful.
02
Geographic access
In my experience, therapists with real ERP training cluster in big cities. If you live in rural Ontario, or in a smaller city without an OCD clinic, online therapy gives you far more options than you'd have locally.
03
Cost
Some therapists charge slightly less for online sessions, reflecting reduced overhead. Even a modest difference, say $10 to $20 a session, adds up when you're attending weekly over several months.
04
Schedule flexibility
Fitting a session into a workday is meaningfully easier when you don't need to account for transit time in both directions. In my experience, steady weekly sessions get more done than sporadic ones. Online makes consistent attendance easier for a lot of people.

Key Takeaway

THE ONLY QUESTION THAT ACTUALLY MATTERS
  • →Is this therapist excellent at treating what I have? Format is secondary.
  • →For OCD: online can be genuinely useful for ERP, because your triggers are at home, not in an office.
  • →For OCD, trials found no significant difference between remote and face-to-face CBT, so don't let format ideology get in the way of getting help.
  • →Practical advantages of online are real: access, scheduling, no commute.

People Also Ask

How we researched this page

This article draws on a 2023 meta-analysis of 22 randomized trials of remote versus face-to-face CBT for OCD (Salazar de Pablo et al., 2023) and a review of video-delivered mental health services (Batastini et al., 2021), alongside what I've seen since moving my practice online. The OCD trials studied CBT in general, not ERP done in your own home, so the idea that home exposures give online an edge is my clinical view, not a trial finding. The Batastini review covers mental health care broadly and isn't specific to OCD.

A note on my perspective

I run a private clinic that treats OCD with ERP, and I'm paid when people book with us. Read what I write with that in mind. Public and lower-cost routes exist too, and the Ontario OCD treatment guide lays them out next to ours.

About the author

Justin La Rose, RP, M.Psy is a Registered Psychotherapist with the College of Registered Psychotherapists of Ontario (CRPO) and Clinical Director of The OCD Clinic in Toronto. He has worked in mental health for more than 25 years and treats OCD with Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP). You can confirm his registration on the CRPO public register.

Client stories on this site are composites, with names and identifying details changed. How we write client stories

How to cite this page

La Rose, J. (2026). Online vs. In-Person Therapy: Which Is Better?. The OCD Clinic. https://theocdclinic.ca/resources/online-vs-in-person

Related Articles
Last updated 2026-09-15 by Justin La Rose, RP, M.Psy. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute clinical advice.