WRITTEN BY
Justin La Rose, RP, M.Psy is a Registered Psychotherapist (RP, M.Psy) and Clinical Director of The OCD Clinic in Toronto. He has worked in mental health for more than 25 years and has spent over a decade in clinical practice, specializing in treating OCD with Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP).
Clinical examples in this article are composites. Any identifying client details have been changed and anonymized to protect confidentiality.
- ERP is the treatment with the strongest evidence base for OCD. Talk therapy, general CBT, and insight-oriented approaches either do nothing or make it worse.
- Online ERP is as effective as in-person. The research is clear - and for ERP specifically, online may have a real advantage.
- NOCD is legitimate but has real limitations. Useful if cost is a barrier. Not the same as a private specialist.
- BetterHelp is not appropriate for clinical OCD. Their therapists aren't required to know ERP, and their own content misrepresents how OCD is treated.
- Private specialists have the strongest evidence base. More expensive, more individualized, better outcomes for complex presentations.
THE NON-NEGOTIABLE: ERP IS THE TREATMENT
Before comparing platforms, this is the only thing that matters:
OCD is treated with ERP - Exposure and Response Prevention. Nothing else has the evidence base. Nothing else addresses the actual mechanism.
ERP works by having you deliberately confront triggering situations while resisting compulsions. Over time, your nervous system learns that the feared outcome doesn't happen - and more importantly, that you can tolerate the uncertainty without compulsing. This is called inhibitory learning, and it's what separates real OCD treatment from talk therapy that doesn't work.
SSRIs help 40-60% of people with OCD. They reduce symptom intensity, which can make ERP more accessible. But medication without ERP produces results that reverse when you stop taking it. ERP produces learning that lasts.
Any platform or therapist that doesn't offer ERP is not offering OCD treatment. Full stop.
OPTION 1: BETTERHELP (THE GENERAL MARKETPLACE)
The Promise: Affordable, accessible therapy matched to your needs.
The Reality: BetterHelp is a general therapy marketplace. Their therapists aren't required to specialize in anything. For many presenting concerns - relationship issues, life transitions, general anxiety - that's fine. For OCD, it's a problem.
WHAT THEIR OWN CONTENT SAYS
BetterHelp's website recommends "CBT" and "talk therapy" for OCD without clearly distinguishing ERP. This is like recommending "antibiotics" for a specific bacterial infection without specifying which one. General CBT without exposure components does not treat OCD. In many cases, it worsens it by encouraging clients to analyze and discuss intrusive thoughts - which is reassurance-seeking by another name.
THE THERAPIST PAY PROBLEM
BetterHelp pays therapists relatively low per-session rates compared with private practice, where a therapist charging $150/hour typically keeps the bulk of that after overhead.
This matters because it shapes who is willing to work there. Independent reviews of the platform frequently cite low pay, burnout, and feeling overworked.
You might find an excellent therapist on BetterHelp. The platform's incentives don't make it likely, and the OCD community is nearly universal in warning against it.
Verdict: Not appropriate for clinical OCD. Therapists feel good, listen well, and do exactly what clients want - which for OCD means providing reassurance. They're doing what feels kind, and they're making it worse.
OPTION 2: NOCD (THE INDUSTRIALIZED SPECIALIST)
The Promise: A tech-enabled network of therapists who exclusively treat OCD using ERP, accessible via insurance.
The Reality: NOCD has genuinely expanded access to OCD treatment. They've also built a system with real limitations worth understanding before you sign up.
THE DATA (WITH CAVEATS)
NOCD has published peer-reviewed research showing strong outcomes:
These are meaningful numbers. The effect size is large. The findings are published in real journals. The caveat: every NOCD study I've reviewed lists NOCD employees as authors with disclosed conflicts of interest. The research is funded by the company, conducted by the company, published by the company. That's not disqualifying - but it means we don't have independent verification.
THE PROTOCOL PROBLEM
NOCD pays its therapists salaried rates that are generally below what an established private specialist earns, and employee reviews frequently mention pressure to follow the protocol over exercising independent clinical judgment.
NOCD has standardized ERP into a protocol. This has real advantages: consistency, quality control, scalability. It's how they've made specialized OCD treatment accessible to people who would never have found a private specialist. But done well, ERP is a collaborative, creative, deeply individualized process. Some therapists thrive within structured systems. Others feel constrained, and the reviews suggest pressure to follow the script can override clinical judgment.
Verdict: A real option with real limitations. Meaningfully better than BetterHelp for OCD. Choose it if cost or access are significant barriers and you have a relatively straightforward presentation.
OPTION 3: PSYCHIATRISTS (THE MEDICAL ROUTE)
The Promise: Medication to reduce the intensity of obsessions and compulsions.
The Reality: Medication is a legitimate part of OCD treatment. It's rarely sufficient on its own.
SSRIs (Prozac, Zoloft, Luvox) help 40-60% of people with OCD, with typical symptom reduction of 20-40%. Higher doses are usually required than for depression. Response takes 8-12 weeks.
The core problem: when you stop the medication, symptoms typically return. Medication treats the intensity of OCD, not the underlying mechanism. It can make ERP more accessible - especially for severe presentations where anxiety is too high to engage - but it doesn't produce the lasting learning that ERP does.
A good psychiatrist refers out for ERP. Many don't. If your psychiatrist is recommending ongoing medication management without concurrent behavioral treatment, push for a referral to an ERP specialist.
Verdict: A valid addition, rarely a standalone solution. Medication + ERP is better than either alone for moderate-to-severe presentations.
OPTION 4: PRIVATE ERP SPECIALISTS (THE STRONGEST EVIDENCE BASE)
The Promise: Individualized, expert-level ERP from someone who's treated hundreds of OCD cases.
The Reality: Exactly that. The best private OCD specialists have seen every subtype, every comorbidity, every presentation that doesn't fit the textbook. They have the flexibility to adapt, the experience to recognize patterns, and the clinical relationship to make exposures actually work.
OCD manifests differently in every person. The exposures that work for contamination OCD, harm OCD, ROCD, scrupulosity, and Pure O are fundamentally different from each other - and even within those categories, individual presentations vary enormously. A therapist with hundreds of OCD cases has seen a version of yours before. That experience isn't transferable to a protocol.
Who should choose a private specialist: Anyone who can afford it (or has benefits coverage), anyone with complex presentations or comorbidities, anyone who has already tried protocol-based approaches without success.
HOW TO VET ANY ERP THERAPIST
Whether you're considering us or someone else, ask these before booking:
"What specific training do you have in ERP?"
You want specific certification or supervision, not "I know CBT."
"How many OCD clients have you treated?"
Dozens to hundreds. Not "a few."
"How do you approach [your specific subtype]?"
They should be able to describe it concretely.
"When do we start exposures?"
Should begin within the first few sessions after assessment. "When you're ready" without a timeline is a red flag.
"What's your success rate with OCD specifically?"
Any experienced OCD specialist tracks this.
Not in Toronto? The IOCDF therapist directory↗ lets you filter specifically for ERP-trained specialists.
SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON
Based on publicly available data, peer-reviewed research, and over a decade in clinical practice.
THE BOTTOM LINE: HOW TO CHOOSE
Choose NOCD if:
- You have insurance they accept and cost is a significant barrier
- You don't have access to a private OCD specialist
- Your presentation is relatively straightforward
Choose a private specialist if:
- You can afford it, or your extended benefits cover psychotherapy
- You have complex presentations or multiple diagnoses
- You've tried protocol-based approaches without lasting results
Add a psychiatrist if:
- Symptom severity interferes with engaging in ERP
- You're open to medication as part of a combined approach
Avoid BetterHelp for OCD:
- Use it for general anxiety or life transitions - not for clinical OCD
- Therapists aren't required to know ERP
- OCD community warns against it universally
Avoid talk therapy for OCD. Analyzing intrusive thoughts reinforces OCD. Insight doesn't change the mechanism. You need behavioral change.
OCD is one of the most treatable mental health conditions. The treatment exists. The question is whether you're getting it.
5 THINGS TO KNOW BEFORE YOU CHOOSE
- ERP is the treatment with the strongest evidence base for OCD - any platform that doesn't offer it is not treating OCD.
- Online ERP is as effective as in-person - the research is clear, and your environment is actually an advantage.
- NOCD is legitimate but protocol-driven - real ERP, real limitations, best for straightforward presentations.
- BetterHelp is not appropriate for clinical OCD - kind therapists doing exactly the wrong thing.
- Private specialists offer the best outcomes - especially for complex presentations or previous treatment failures.
I'll tell you honestly whether we're the right fit - and if we're not, I'll point you somewhere that is. Free 20-minute consultation, no pressure.
Book Free Consultation →- Feusner, J. D., Farrell, N. R., Kreyling, J., McGrath, P. B., Rhode, A., Faneuff, T., Lonsway, S., Mohideen, R., Jurich, J. E., Trusky, L., & Smith, S. M. (2022). Online Video Teletherapy Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Exposure and Response Prevention: Clinical Outcomes From a Retrospective Longitudinal Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. PubMed↗ [Authors disclosed NOCD employment]
- Reid, J. E., Laws, K. R., Drummond, L., Vismara, M., Grancini, B., Mpavaenda, D., & Fineberg, N. A. (2021). Cognitive behavioural therapy with exposure and response prevention in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Comprehensive Psychiatry. PubMed↗
- Response rates among treatment completers across randomized controlled trials (Foa et al., 2005; Law & Boisseau, 2019). Individual results vary. Foa et al. (2005)↗; Law & Boisseau (2019)↗