OCD Treatment

TMS vs Ketamine
vs Psilocybin
For OCD

By Justin La Rose, RP, M.Psy · Registered Psychotherapist (CRPO) · Clinical Director, The OCD Clinic

Evidence last reviewed: October 2026

Of TMS, ketamine and psilocybin for OCD, only TMS is part of standard care, and it's a third-line option for severe OCD that hasn't responded to ERP and medication. Ketamine and psilocybin are still experimental, for research settings only. That's the position of a 2026 BMJ review and the International OCD Foundation's guidelines. None of the three replaces ERP.

I get why people ask. If you've done the hard work and you're still stuck, a new option that promises fast relief is going to sound good. So here's what the evidence actually shows, without the hype in either direction.

The short answer

  • TMS: A review of 12 meta-analyses of randomized trials found small to medium effects for repetitive TMS compared with sham, with methods varying widely between studies (Abramowitz et al., 2026).
  • TMS with ERP: In a randomized trial of 61 patients, adding TMS before ERP sessions did not outperform sham TMS plus ERP, though the review notes the sample was small (Abramowitz et al., 2026).
  • Ketamine: Small studies have reported rapid drops in OCD symptoms within hours of IV ketamine, lasting up to about a week (Abramowitz et al., 2026).
  • Psilocybin: In a 2026 randomized trial of 15 people with OCD, repeated psilocybin doses reduced symptoms where an active placebo did not, but the trial was tiny and its authors call for larger studies (Moreno et al., 2026).
  • Guidelines: The IOCDF lists TMS as third-line for severe treatment-resistant OCD and ketamine and psychedelics as experimental, not to be used as treatment outside controlled research (IOCDF).

How do TMS, ketamine and psilocybin compare?

TMSKetaminePsilocybin
What it isMagnetic pulses to specific brain areas, through the scalp, no anesthesiaA dissociative anesthetic given at low doses, usually by IV in studiesA psychedelic compound from mushrooms that acts on serotonin receptors
Evidence for OCDRandomized trials against sham; small to medium effects across meta-analysesSmall early studies showing fast, short-lived drops in symptomsA first small randomized trial (15 people) in 2026; larger trials still needed
Where it fitsThird line, for severe OCD that hasn't responded to ERP and medicationExperimental: research settings onlyExperimental: research settings only
Main limitsMethods vary a lot between studies; best targets and settings still unclearEffects reported lasting up to about a week; long-term data lackingHard to blind a trial; placebo effects may inflate results

Does TMS work for OCD?

TMS has modest evidence for OCD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation uses magnetic pulses through the scalp to change activity in brain areas linked to OCD. Across meta-analyses of randomized trials against sham, the effects were small to medium, and it's considered safe. The catch is that studies use different targets, frequencies and numbers of sessions, so the best way to do it is still unclear (Abramowitz et al., 2026).

The IOCDF places TMS as a third-line option for severe, treatment-resistant OCD and notes that certain forms are FDA-approved for OCD in the United States (IOCDF). A milder cousin, transcranial direct current stimulation, showed no advantage over sham in a meta-analysis of six trials.

Does ketamine work for OCD?

Ketamine looks interesting for OCD, but it's early. Small studies found symptoms dropped within hours of an IV dose and stayed lower for up to about a week. The proposed mechanism involves glutamate, a different brain system from the serotonin system SSRIs work on. What's missing is larger, longer trials, and the IOCDF lists it as experimental (Abramowitz et al., 2026; IOCDF). A week of relief is real relief. It's not the same as learning, and learning is what makes OCD loosen its grip for good.

Does psilocybin work for OCD?

We don't know yet whether psilocybin works for OCD, but the first randomized trial is in. In 2026, researchers gave 15 people with OCD four weekly sessions of high-dose psilocybin, low-dose psilocybin or an active placebo (lorazepam), then four more high-dose sessions for everyone. Psilocybin reduced symptoms and the placebo didn't. After eight weeks, 73% met the bar for response and 40% for remission, and the gains faded but held up substantially at six months, with no serious side effects (Moreno et al., 2026).

Here's how to read that. Fifteen people is tiny, five per group in the blinded part, and the second phase wasn't blinded at all, so the 73% comes from a stretch where everyone knew they were getting the real thing. It's a reason to run bigger trials, not a reason to book a retreat. The full breakdown is in OCD research updates. Earlier, the only published study was an open-label one with nine participants (Abramowitz et al., 2026).

The big research problem is blinding. A psychedelic is hard to mistake for a placebo, which can inflate how well it seems to work. The IOCDF is direct about it: people with OCD shouldn't use psychedelics as treatment outside controlled research (IOCDF). If you're curious, the right route is a clinical trial, not a retreat.

What about deep brain stimulation?

Deep brain stimulation is the most invasive option: an implanted device sends electrical pulses to a specific brain region. It's reserved for adults with severe OCD that hasn't responded to anything else. The IOCDF reports substantial relief for many patients, while the BMJ review notes most studies are small and uncontrolled, and care is limited to specialty centres (Abramowitz et al., 2026; IOCDF).

Should you try these before ERP?

No. Every guideline puts ERP and medication first, and many people who say ERP didn't work never got real ERP. Before you look at magnets or mushrooms, check the basics on treatment-resistant OCD, and see the whole ladder on OCD treatment in 2026: what works. If you're in Ontario and want to talk it through, start with OCD treatment in Toronto.

FAQ

What Else Do People Ask About These?

No. ERP is first-line and has far stronger evidence. TMS is a third-line option for severe OCD that hasn't responded to ERP and medication. In one trial, adding TMS before ERP sessions didn't beat sham TMS plus ERP.

Ketamine for OCD is still experimental. The International OCD Foundation lists it with psychedelics as research only. If you're considering it, talk to a psychiatrist, and ask whether a clinical trial is an option.

There's no evidence it cures OCD. The first randomized trial, published in 2026, had only 15 participants, and its authors say larger trials are needed. The IOCDF advises against psychedelic use as treatment outside controlled research.

No. Every guideline puts ERP and medication first. These options are for after first-line treatment, done properly, hasn't been enough.

Want The Basics Done Properly First?

Book a free 20-minute consultation. No commitment, no pressure. Just a conversation about where you are and how we can help.

Book Free Consultation
Online across Ontario · Toronto · In-Person and Video Sessions · Evening & Weekend Available · Many extended health plans cover Registered Psychotherapists

How we researched this page

This page summarizes a 2026 state-of-the-art review in the BMJ (Abramowitz et al., 2026), the International OCD Foundation's treatment guide, read in October 2026, and the first randomized trial of repeated psilocybin dosing for OCD (Moreno et al., 2026), which was published after the BMJ review. I'm a psychotherapist, not a prescriber or neurologist, so this is a plain-language summary of the evidence, not a recommendation for any procedure. The ketamine and psilocybin research is small and early, TMS methods vary between studies, and the review's authors are involved with the IOCDF, so the two sources are not independent.

A note on my perspective

I run a private clinic that treats OCD with ERP, and I'm paid when people book with us. Read what I write with that in mind. Public and lower-cost routes exist too, and the Ontario OCD treatment guide lays them out next to ours.

About the author

Justin La Rose, RP, M.Psy is a Registered Psychotherapist with the College of Registered Psychotherapists of Ontario (CRPO) and Clinical Director of The OCD Clinic in Toronto. He has worked in mental health for more than 25 years and treats OCD with Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP). You can confirm his registration on the CRPO public register.

Client stories on this site are composites, with names and identifying details changed. How we write client stories

How to cite this page

La Rose, J. (2026). TMS vs Ketamine vs Psilocybin for OCD: What the Evidence Says. The OCD Clinic. https://theocdclinic.ca/ocd-treatment/tms-vs-ketamine-vs-psilocybin